Dynamics of the spatial organization of recreation in the zone of influence of St. Petersburg in the second decade of the 21st century
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2021.407Abstract
The results of research on the key area "Sestra River" (229 km2), located within St. Petersburg and the Leningrad region, are considered. The study of recreational development of the territory was carried out in 2009-2010 and 2019-2020 using field surveys, analysis of topographic maps of different times and satellite images. Maps of recreational development of the model territory for the 1960s, 2010, and 2020 were compiled. In 2010, 16 types of land use were identified as the territories that have a recreational function as the main or additional one; this number does not include complexes with a primary residential and additional recreational function (cottage settlements, etc.). In 2020, 17 types of such territories were identified. Comparison of maps of recreational development revealed qualitative changes in various recreational complexes in 2010-2020: collective gardens, social dachas, year-round and seasonal complexes with low-rise buildings, cultural entertainment and sports-entertainment centers, etc. Over 10 years, the share of the area of recreational and residential-recreational complexes at the "Sestra River" key area has increased from 4.8 to 5.2 %. Recreational activities are being diversified. While preserving its traditional types, new types appear: farms with a recreational function, rope parks, entertainment complexes, etc. Recreational complexes for year-round use with low-rise buildings on forest land are being created. Cottage development becomes comparable to recreational development of the territory. A significant part of the houses in cottage and dacha settlements and collective gardens are used as permanent residence; at the same time, their recreational function becomes additional. Increasing the area of cottage settlements on forest land reduces the availability of landscapes of high recreational value for the population. Recreational transformation of territories, which is inseparable from suburbanization in the zones of influence of major cities, is rapidly changing the landscapes.
Keywords:
recreation, Saint Petersburg, suburbanization, recreational complex, recreational development, cottage settlement, landscape
Downloads
References
Браде, И., Махрова, А. Г., Нефедова, Т. Г., Трейвиш, А. И. (2013). Особенности субурбанизации в Московской агломерации в постсоветский период. Известия Российской академии наук. Серия географическая, (2), 19-29.
Исаченко, Г. А., Исаченко, Т. Е. (2011). Преобразование ландшафтов под воздействием рекреации за последние 50 лет (на примере пригородной зоны Санкт-Петербурга). Известия Русского географического общества, 143 (3), 38-50.
Исаченко, Т. Е, Исаченко, Г. А., Озерова, С. Д. (2020). Оценка рекреационной нарушенности и регулирование нагрузок на особо охраняемых природных территориях Санкт-Петербурга. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Науки о Земле, 65 (1), 16-32. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2020.102
Исаченко, Т. Е., Косарев, А. В. (2019). Рекреационное природопользование. Москва: Юрайт.
Колбовский, Е. Ю. (2002). Экология рекреации и туризма: ландшафтно-географический анализ на примере Верхневолжья. Ярославль: Изд-во ЯГПУ.
Махрова, А. Г. (2008). Организованные коттеджные поселки: новый тип поселений (на примере Московской области). Региональные исследования, 17 (2), 13-20.
Махрова, А. Г. (2014). Роль организованных коттеджных поселков в развитии субурбанизации в постсоветской России. Известия Российской академии наук. Серия географическая, (4), 49-59.
Михеева, З. А. (2012). Субурбанизация как инструмент решения жилищной проблемы Санкт-Петербурга и Ленинградской области. Автореферат дис. … канд. географ. наук.
Нефедова, Т. Г., Аверкиева, К. В., Махрова, А. Г. (ред.) (2016). Между домом… и домом. Возвратная пространственная мобильность населения России. Москва: Новый хронограф.
Саянов, А. А. (2014). Географические факторы формирования коттеджных поселков в России. Автореферат дис. … канд. географ. наук.
Чижова, В. П. (2011). Рекреационные ландшафты: устойчивость, нормирование, управление. Смоленск: Ойкумена.
Doxtater, D. (2008). What Visitors “Do” in Recreational Landscapes: Using Categories of Affordances for Evaluation, Design and Simulation. In: R. Gimblett, H. Skov-Petersen, ed., Monitoring, Simulation, and Management of Visitor Landscapes. Tucson, AR, USA: University of Arizona Press, 13-35.
Roca, Z. (ed.) (2013). Second Home Tsecondourism in Europe: Lifestyle Issues and Policy Responses. Farnham, UK; Berlington, USA: Ashgate Publishing.
Torkildsen, G. (2012). Leisure and Recreation Management. New York: Routledge. Traven, V. (2005). La Datcha en Russie de 1917 à nos jours. Paris: Sextant.
Zee, D. van der (1990). The complex relationship between landscape and recreation. Landscape Ecology, (4), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129830
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Earth Sciences" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
