Headquarters locations of the largest US corporations: uneven geographies and migrations

Authors

  • Alexandra M. Kiryukhina Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University 119991, Russia, Moscow, GSP-1, Leninskye Gory st., Lomonosov MSU, Main Building, Faculty of Geography, Department of Human Geography of Foreign Countries https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6154-8809
  • Ruslan A. Dokhov ¹ Faculty of Geography, Lomonosov Moscow State University 119991, Russia, Moscow, GSP-1, Leninskye Gory st., Lomonosov MSU, Main Building, Faculty of Geography, Department of Human Geography of Foreign Countries; Faculty of Geography and Geoinformation Technologies, HSE University 109028, Russia, Moscow, 11 Pokrovsky Bulvar, Pokrovka Complex, room S221
  • Kirill A. Puzanov Faculty of Urban and Regional Development, HSE University 101000, Russia, Moscow, 13 Myasnitskaya Ulitsa, Building 4, room 417

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2024.103

Abstract

The headquarters of large corporations are the main asset of the economies of the largest cities in the developed world. Based on materials from Fortune-500 companies, an analysis of the spatial dynamics of corporate headquarters in US MSAs for 1980–2019 was carried out. Mapping and geographic analysis of the concentration and directions of migration made it possible to identify the main changes in the spatial pattern of the location of economic decision-making centers in the United States. Headquarters remain highly concentrated: half of them are located in the largest MSAs by population. In terms of revenue, MSA Fayetteville (Arkansas, headquarters of Walmart) stands out, in terms of market value - San Jose (the heart of Silicon Valley, only 36 in population), in terms of the number of employees - MSAs in which retail companies are located (Minneapolis, Atlanta). Geographic mobility of corporate headquarters has increased dramatically over the past 40 years. The main directions of migration: from the Northeast and from California to the MSA New York, the (Post-)Industrial Great Lakes (MSA Chicago), Texas, to the South (MSAs Atlanta and Charlotte) and the Pacific West. There are noticeable trends towards industry agglomeration: IT companies are moving to California, and financial firms are leaving it, moving to Texas. The main areas for the emergence of new headquarters of the largest corporations are: New York, (Post-)Industrial Great Lakes, the South, Texas and the Pacific West. In addition to the usual MSAs-leaders - New York (10% of all new headquarters), San Jose (10%), Chicago, Dallas and Houston - Denver and Richmond stand out. The spatial concentration of locations for new headquarters continues to increase. At the same time, at least one new headquarters appeared in ⅔ of the agglomerations. The identified trends in the migration of existing and the emergence of new corporate headquarters suggest significant shifts in the economic geography of the United States. The rapid growth of cities in the South and Inland South-West shows that the economies of these areas have reached a new level, expressed in the formation of their own “gateways” to the global economy.

Keywords:

corporate headquarters, US economy, corporate geography, localization, corporate strategy, agglomeration, human capital, regional economy

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Гудкова Т. В., Логинова В. С. (2020). Решоринг промышленности США: цифровизация vs глобализация. США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура, 7, 42–60.

Гудкова Т. В., Сухорукова Д. М. (2022). Факторы трансформации глобальных цепочек добавленной стоимости. США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура, 11, 47–63.

Колясев Е. Ф., Пилька М. Э., Слука Н. А. (2022). Карты размещения зарубежных ТНК как вклад в географию глобальных городов США. ИнтерКарто. ИнтерГИС, 28(1), 148–160.

Конарева Л. А. (2023). Глобализация как угроза для американских промышленных предприятий в эпоху цифровой экономики. США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура, 1, 102–114.

Колосова Ю. А., Смирнягин Л. В., Харитонов В. М. (1987). Лос-Анджелес. В: В. В. Вольский, Л. И. Бонифатьева, В. М. Харитонов, под ред., Крупнейшие города капиталистических и развивающихся стран. М.: Издательство Московского университета, 127–148.

Новиков А. В., Смирнягин Л. В. (1987). Нью-Йорк. В: В. В. Вольский, Л. И. Бонифатьева, В. М. Харитонов, под ред., Крупнейшие города капиталистических и развивающихся стран. М.: Издательство Московского университета, 90–114.

Смирнягин Л. В. (1989). Районы США. Портрет современной Америки. М.: Мысль.

Смирнягин Л. В. (2011). Мегарегионы как новая форма территориальной организации общества. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 5. География, 1, 9–15.

Пилька М. Э., Слука Н. А. (2014). Размещение представительств крупнейших транснациональных корпораций в глобальных городах США. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 5. География, 4, 75–82.

Пилька М. Э., Слука Н. А., Ткаченко Т. Х., Цаликова Е. Р. (2018). Крупнейшие транснациональные корпорации в глобальных городах США: центр-периферические диспаритеты. Вестник Московского университета. Серия 5:География, 6, 83–92.

Adler P., Florida R. (2020). Geography as strategy: the changing geography of corporate headquarters in post-industrial capitalism. Regional Studies, 54(5), 610–620.

Belderbos R., Du H. S., Goerzen A. (2017). Global cities, connectivity, and the location choice of MNC regional headquarters. Journal of Management Studies, 54(8), 1271–1302.

Birkinshaw J., Braunerhjelm P., Holm U., Terjesen S. (2006). Why do some multinational corporations relocate their headquarters overseas? Strategic Management Journal, 27(7), 681–700.

Chandler Jr A. D. (1991). The functions of the HQ unit in the multibusiness firm. Strategic management journal, 12(2), 31–50.

Ciabuschi F., Dellestrand H., Holm U. (2012). The role of headquarters in the contemporary MNC. Journal of International Management, 18(3), 213–223.

Collis D., Young D., Goold M. (2007). The size, structure, and performance of corporate headquarters. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 383–405.

Desai M. A. (2009). The decentering of the global firm. World Economy, 32 (9), 1271–1290.

Phillips K. (1969). The Emerging Republican Majority. New Rochelle, N. Y.: Arlington House.

Fitjar R. D., Rodríguez‐Pose A. (2017). Nothing is in the air. Growth and Change, 48(1), 22–39.

Florida R., Gulden T., Mellander C. (2008). The rise of the mega-region. Cambridge journal of regions, economy and society, 1(3), 459–476.

Florida R. (2005). The world is spiky. The Atlantic Monthly, 296(3), 48–51.

Frick S. A., Rodríguez‐Pose A. (2018). Big or small cities? On city size and economic growth. Growth and change, 49(1), 4–32.

Fortune: official website (2019) Fortune-500. [online] Available at: https://fortune.com/ranking/fortune500/2019/ (Accessed 20.05.2023)

Garvin D. A., Levesque L. C. (2008). The multiunit enterprise. Harvard Business Review, 86 (6), 106–117.

Grant R., Nijman J. (2002). Globalization and the corporate geography of cities in the less‐developed world. Annals of the Association of American geographers, 92(2), 320–340.

Henderson J. V., Ono Y. (2008). Where do manufacturing firms locate their headquarters? Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2), 431–450.

Klier T. H. (2006). Where the headquarters are: Location patterns of large public companies, 1990–2000. Economic Development Quarterly, 20 (2), 117–128.

Kotkin J. (2020). The Luxury City is Going Bust. [online] Newgeography: official website. Available at: https://www.newgeography.com/content/006558-the-luxury-city-going-bust (Accessed 20.05.2023)

Krätke S. (2004). City of talents? Berlin's regional economy, socio‐spatial fabric and ‘worst practice’urban governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3), 511–529.

Krätke S. (2010). ‘Creative cities’ and the rise of the dealer class: a critique of Richard Florida's approach to urban theory. International journal of urban and regional research, 34(4), 835–853.

Menz M., Scheef C. (2014). Chief strategy officers: Contingency analysis of their presence in top management teams. Strategic Management Journal, 35(3), 461–471.

Office of Management and Budget. (2010). 2010 standards for delineating metropolitan and micropolitan statistical area. Federal Register, 75(123), 37246–37252.

Pilka M. E., Sluka N. A., Szymańska D. (2022). The world’s largest foreign TNCs in U.S. global cities: observations in studying industrial composition. Cities, 120, 97–105.

Porter M. (1987). From Competitive Advantage to Corporate Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 65 (5), 43–59.

Storper M., Kemeny T., Makarem N., Osman T. (2015). The rise and fall of urban economies: Lessons from San Francisco and Los Angeles. Stanford University Press.

Strauss-Kahn V., Vives X. (2009). Why and where do headquarters move? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(2), 168–186.

Taylor P., Ni P., Derudder B., Hoyler M., Huang J., Lu F., Pain K., Witlox F., Yang X., Bassens D., Shen W. (2009). The way we were: command-and-control centres in the global space-economy on the eve of the 2008 geo-economic transition. Environment and Planning A, 41(1), 7–12.

Taylor P. J., Csomós G. (2012). Cities as control and command centres: Analysis and interpretation. Cities, 29(6), 408–411.

Published

2024-04-22

How to Cite

Kiryukhina, A. M., Dokhov, R. A. and Puzanov , K. A. (2024) “Headquarters locations of the largest US corporations: uneven geographies and migrations”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Earth Sciences, 69(1). doi: 10.21638/spbu07.2024.103.

Issue

Section

Articles