Урбанизация или субурбанизация определяет миграцию населения в Московской области?

Lilia  Karachurina

doi:10.21638/spbu07.2022.208

Authors

Lilia Karachurina HSE University, 20, Miasnitskaia ul., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7760-7925

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2022.208

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine population migration to Moscow Oblast. Moscow Oblast belongs to a small number of Russia’s regions characterized by intensive and diverse population migration. The region attracts migrants from other federal subjects of Russia as well as from abroad, there are also a distinct migration flow to Moscow Oblast originating in Moscow and migration within the borders of Moscow Oblast itself. The motives for migration are analyzed separately for studied migration flows along with the factors of the region’s attractivity for migrants, the differences between migrant flows (moving to Moscow Oblast, moving within Moscow Oblast and ‘non-mobile’ population) are identified. The research was conducted with the help of a specially designed questionnaire via SurveyMonkey platform. The study showed that the ‘suburbanization’ motives for migration related to ecological situation, privacy and monotonous urban environment are not dominant even amongst groups of migrants who have moved to villa communities and townhouses. The following factors indicating great importance for all groups of migrants were identified: the ratio between land price and distance from the center of Moscow, access to the advantages of Moscow city’s labor market, service, and leisure industry. In this context, we can imply that importance of the ‘urban logic’ remains high. Survey responses on the importance of location characteristics, as well as demographic parameters show that the most peculiar population group is ‘non-mobile’ population of Moscow Oblast. Approximately 62% of respondents from households that include those who had migration experience are oriented to work or study in Moscow. The most ‘targeted’ at the capital are migrants who had moved to Moscow Oblast from Moscow.

Keywords:

motives of migration, reasons for migration, migrant, respondent, housing migration, Moscow Oblast, migration attractiveness

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Браде, И., Махрова, А. Г., Нефедова, Т. Г., Трейвиш, А. И. (2013). Особенности субурбанизации в Московской агломерации. Известия РАН. Сер. геогр., 2, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2013-2-19-29

Кириллов, П. Л., Махрова, А. Г. (2009). Cубурбанизация в Московском столичном регионе: современное и перспективное состояние. Региональные исследования, 4–5, 42–54.

Куричев, Н. К., Куричева, Е. К. (2018). Миграционная и инвестиционная активность жителей городов России на рынке жилья Москвы и Подмосковья. Регион: экономика и социология, 3 (99), 171–197. https://doi.org/10.15372/REG20180309

Куричев, Н. К., Куричева, Е. К. (2020). Пространственная структура жилищного строительства в Московской агломерации: радиально-секторальная дифференциация. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского университета. Науки о Земле, 65 (1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2020.105

Махрова, А. Г. (2014а) Особенности стадиального развития Московской агломерации. Вестник Моск. ун-та. Серия 5: География, 4, 10–16.

Махрова, А. Г. (2014b) Роль организованных коттеджных поселков в развитии субурбанизации в постсоветской России. Известия РАН. Сер. геогр., 4, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.15356/0373-2444-2014-4-49-59

Махрова, А. Г., Нефедова, Т. Г., Трейвиш, А. И. (2016). Поляризация пространства центрально-российского мегалополиса и мобильность населения. Вестник Моск. ун-та. Серия 5: География, 5, 77–85.

Мкртчян, Н. В. (2015). Миграция в Москве и Московской области: региональные и структурные особенности. Региональные исследования, 3, 107–116.

Мкртчян, Н. В., Флоринская, Ю. Ф. (2020). Почему люди уезжают из одних регионов и приезжают в другие: мотивы межрегиональной миграции в России. Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, 5, 130–153. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2020.5.1619

Шитова, Ю. Ю., Шитов, Ю. А. (2013). Маятниковая трудовая миграция в Московском регионе. Демоскоп Weekly, 569–570. [online] Доступно на: http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2013/0569/tema01.php [Дата доступа 15.12.2021].

Aner, L. G. (2016). Dwelling habitus and urban out-migration in Denmark. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23 (4), 662–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776414532932

Artamonova, A. and Syse, A. (2021). Do older parents’ assistance needs deter parent-child geographic divergence in Norway? Health and Place, 70, 102599 (in Press). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2021.102599

Auriat, N. (1991). Who forgets? An analysis of memory effects in a retrospective survey on migration history. European Journal of Population, 7 (4), 311–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01796872

Baldersheim, H. (2014). Place qualities — Norwegian preferences. Tidsskrift for Samfunnsforskning, 55 (1), 53–75.

Coulter, R. and Scott, J. (2015). What motivates residential mobility? Re-examining self-reported reasons for desiring and making residential moves. Population, Space and Place, 21 (4), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.1863

Geyer, H. S. Jr. and Geyer, H. S. Sr. (2015). Disaggregated Population Migration Trends in South Africa Between 1996 and 2011: a Differential Urbanisation Approach. Urban Forum, 26 (1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-014-9229-1

Hamm, R., Keggenhoff, G. K. and Jager, A. (2017). Live here? No, thank you! Migration and its causes in moenchengladbach — a city for living and working. Regional Science Inquiry, 9 (1), 145–151.

Hirt, S. (2007). Suburbanizing Sofia: Characteristics of post-socialist peri-urban change. Urban Geography, 28 (8), 755–780. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.28.8.755

Jauhiainen, J. S. (2009). Will the retiring baby boomers return to rural periphery? Journal of Rural Studies, 25 (1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.05.001

Karachurina, L. and Mkrtchyan, N. (2020). Age-specific Migration in Regional Centres and Peripheral Areas of Russia. Comparative Population Studies, 44, 414–447. https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2020-12

Kok, H. (1999). Migration from the city to the countryside in Hungary and Poland. GeoJournal, 49(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007092228633

Kontuly, T. and Tammaru, T. (2006). Population subgroups responsible for new urbanization and suburbanization in Estonia. European Urban and Regional Studies, 13 (4), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776406065435

Korpi, M. and Clark, W. A. W. (2017). Human capital theory and internal migration: Do average outcomes distort our view of migrant motives? Migration Letters, 14 (2), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v14i2.329

Krisjane, Z. and Berzins, M. (2012). Post-socialist urban trends: New patterns and motivations for migration in the suburban areas of Rīga, Latvia. Urban Studies, 49 (2), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011402232

Lee, E. S. (1966) A Theory of Migration. Demography, 3 (1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2060063

Mazanti, B. (2007). Choosing residence, community and neighbours — Theorizing families’ motives for moving. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, 89 (1), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0467.2007.00239.x

Michielin, F., Mulder, C. H. and Zorlu, A. (2008). Distance to parents and geographical mobility. Population, Space and Place, 14 (4), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.509

Mulder, C. H. (2007). The family context and residential choice: A challenge for new research. Population, Space and Place, 13 (4), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.456

Murakami, K., Gilroy, R. and Atterton, J. (2009). Planning for the ageing countryside in Japan: The potential impact of multi-habitation. Planning Practice and Research, 24 (3), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697450903020734

Niedomysl, T. (2011). How migration motives change over migration distance: Evidence on variation across socio-economic and demographic groups. Regional Studies, 45(6), 843–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343401003614266

Novotný, L. and Pregi, L. (2017). Selective migration of population subgroups by educational attainment in the urban region of Bratislava. Geograficky Casopis, 69 (1), 21–39.

Nowok, B., Findlay, A. and McCollum, D. (2018). Linking residential relocation desires and behaviour with life domain satisfaction. Urban Studies, 55 (4), 870–890. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016665972

Plane, D. and Jurjevich, J. R. (2009). Ties That No Longer Bind? The Patterns and Repercussions of Age-Articulated Migration. The Professional Geographer, 61 (1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00330120802577558

Rerat, P. (2012). The New Demographic Growth of Cities: The Case of Reurbanisation in Switzerland. Urban Studies, 49(5), 1107–1125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011408935

Rogerson, P. A., Weng, R. H. and Lin, G. (1993). The Spatial Separation of Parents and Their Adult Children. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 83 (4), 656–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1993.tb01959.x

Stöhr, T. (2015). Siblings’ interaction in migration decisions: who provides for the elderly left behind? Journal of Population Economics, 28 (3), 593–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-015-0546-z