Ethno-territorial features of social inequality in the USA

Authors

  • Dmitrii Zhitin St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3810-9138
  • Aleksei Prokofev St Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6121-6345

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2022.207

Abstract

The social fragmentation of the US population has pronounced ethno-territorial features. On the example of ten ethnic groups of Americans of various ancestry (German, Italian, Polish, Russian, Chinese, Asian Indian, Filipino, Mexican, Cuban, Salvadoran), the spatial features of social inequality are examined. Six indicators of social well-being were considered in three areas: education, employment status and earnings. The indicators under consideration include: 1) the proportion of individuals without a high school diploma; 2) the proportion of individuals with a bachelor's degree or higher; 3) the proportion of individuals who are not in the labor force; 4) the unemployment rate; 5) median annual earnings; 6) the proportion of individuals with income below poverty level. The states and the District of Columbia were taken as the spatial unit for analyzing the ethno-territorial heterogeneity of social inequality in the United States. The study revealed the socio-spatial heterogeneity of the US territory, determined the hierarchy of ethnic groups in terms of social well-being, and identified states that have the highest deviations from the "normal" distribution of the indicators under consideration. The results obtained make it possible to judge both the influence of ethnic origin and a specific territory on the level of social well-being of the US population. The existing social hierarchy of the considered ethnic groups is highly stable in most states. More often than not, members of a particular ethnic group living in more socially wealthy states will outperform members of the same group living in less socially wealthy states in terms of social well-being. However, this feature is not typical for all states and ethnic groups equally. This allows us to assert that in the United States, inequality between ethnic groups can acquire its own specific characteristics depending on a particular territory.

Keywords:

social well-being, ethnic group, spatial characteristics, ethnosocial differences, USA, state

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Алов, И. Н. (2020). Пространственная концентрация афроамериканского населения в крупных городских агломерациях США. Известия РАН. Серия географическая, 5 (84), 694–703.

Алов, И. Н. (2021). Эволюция концепций пространственной сегрегации в городах США. Региональные исследования, 1 (71), 107–117.

Доброхотов, Л. Н. (2016). Социальное неравенство — насущная проблема американского общества. Социологические исследования, 2, 93–101.

Житин, Д. В., Прокофьев, А. Д. (2019). Пространственные особенности смены этнической самоидентификации жителей США европейского происхождения, Известия Русского географического общества, 3 (151), 18–40.

Кульчитская, А. М., Самсонов, Т. Е. (2018). Региональное своеобразие китайского населения США. Региональные исследования, 4 (62), 17–27.

Сорокин, П. А. (1992). Человек, цивилизация, общество (Серия «Мыслители ХХ века»). М.: Политиздат.

Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. A. and Verdier, T. (2012). Can’t We All Be More Like Scandinavians? Asymmetric Growth and Institutions in an Interdependent World. MIT Department of Economics Working Paper No. 12–22.

Bodovski, K. and Durham, R. E. (2010). Parental Practices and Achievement of Mexican and Chinese Immigrant Children in the USA: assimilation patterns? Research in Comparative and International Education, 5 (2), 156–175.

Brittingham, A. and De la Cruz, G. P. (2004). Ancestry: 2000. Census 2000 brief. US Census Bureau.

Burchardi, K. B., Chaney, T. and Hassan, T. A. (2019). Migrants, Ancestors, and Foreign Investments. The Review of Economic Studies, 86 (4), 1448–1486.

Calvo, R. and Sarkisian, N. (2015). Racial/ethnic differences in postmigration education among adult immigrants in the USA. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38 (7), 1029–1049.

Chiswick, B. R., Houseworth, C. A. (2008). Ethnic Intermarriage among Immigrants: Human Capital and Assortative Mating. IZA Discussion Paper No. 3740.

Data.census.gov (2015). The United States Census Bureau Official Website. [online] Доступно на: https://data.census.gov/cedsci/advanced [Дата доступа 20.02.2021].

Duncan, B. and Trejo, S. (2011). Intermarriage and the Intergenerational Transmission of Ethnic Identity and Human Capital for Mexican Americans. Journal of Labor Economics, 29 (2), 195–227.

Factfinder.census.gov (2015). The United States Census Bureau Official Website. [online] Доступно на: https://factfinder.census.gov [Дата доступа 12.02.2020].

Frank, A. I. (2003). Using measures of spatial autocorrelation to describe socio-economic and racial residential patterns in US urban areas. Socio-economic applications of geographic information science (Innovations in GIS 9). London, UK: Taylor and Francis. 147–162.

Friedman, H. H. and Hertz, S. (2015). Is the United States Still the Best Country in the World? Think Again. SSRN Electronic Journal.

Fryer, R. G. (2010). Racial Inequality in the 21st Century: The Declining Significance of Discrimination. NBER Working Paper No. 16256.

Fulford, S. L., Petkov, I. and Schiantarelli, F. (2015). Does It Matter Where You Came From? Ancestry Composition and Economic Performance of U.S. Counties, 1850–2010. IZA Discussion Paper No. 9060.

Garoogian, D. (2003). Ancestry in America: A Comparative City-By-City Guide to over 200 Ethnic Backgrounds-With Rankings. Grey House Publishing.

Gevrek, Z. E, Gevrek, D. and Gupta, S. (2013). Culture, Intermarriage, and Differentials in Second-Generation Immigrant Women’s Labor Supply. International Migration, 51 (6), 146–167.

Glaeser, E. L. (2005). Inequality. KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series 05-056.

Jencks, C. and Burtless, G. (2002). American Inequality and Its Consequences. LIS Working papers 339.

Johnston, R. J., Poulsen, M. and Forrest, J. (2004) The Comparative Study of Ethnic Residential Segregation in the USA, 1980–2000. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 95 (5), 550–569.

Lee, B. A., Reardon, S. F., Firebaugh, G., Farrell, C. R., Matthews, S. A. and O‘Sullivan, D. (2008). Beyond the census tract: Patterns and determinants of racial segregation at multiple geographic scales. American Sociological Review, 73 (5), 766–791.

Lewis, L. A. (2020). That little Mexican part of me: race, place and transnationalism among U.S. African-descent Mexicans. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43 (6), 995–1012.

Liebig, S. (2012). Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett (2009): The Spirit Level. Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. Social Justice Research, 25 (1), 102–107.

Loury, G. C. (2002). The anatomy of racial inequality. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.

Moss, D. A., Thaker, A. and Rudnick, H. (2013). Inequality and Decision Making: Imagining a New Line of Inquiry. Harvard Business School BGIE Unit Working Paper No. 13–099.

Ogunwole, S. U., Battle, K. R. and Cohen, D. T. (2017). Characteristics of selected Sub-Saharan African and Caribbean ancestry groups in the United States: 2008–2012. American Community Survey Reports. US Census Bureau.

Painter, M. A. and Flagg, C. (2020). Trust and White Ethnic Diversity in Small Town Iowa. The Sociological Quarterly.

Piketty, T. and Saez, E. (2001). Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998. NBER Working Paper No. 8467.

Reardon, S. F., Matthews, S. A., O‘Sullivan, D., Lee, B. A., Firebaugh, G., Farrell, C. R. and Bischoff, K. (2008). The geographic scale of metropolitan racial segregation. Demography, 45 (3), 489–514.

Strand, P. J. (2010). Inheriting Inequality: Wealth, Race, and the Laws of Succession. Oregon Law Review, 89, 453–504.

Thernstrom, S., Orlov, A. and Handlin, O. (1980) Harvard Encyclopedia of American Ethnic Groups. The Belknap Press of Harvard University press.

Wilkinson, R. and Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit Level: Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better. Allen Lane.

Wolfson, M. C. and Murphy, B. B. (1998). New Views on Inequality Trends in Canada and the United States. Statistics Canada Working Paper No. 124.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Zhitin, D. and Prokofev, A. (2022) “Ethno-territorial features of social inequality in the USA”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Earth Sciences, 67(2), pp. 333–359. doi: 10.21638/spbu07.2022.207.

Issue

Vol. 67 No. 2 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Earth Sciences" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.