The concept of ecological carrying capacity: current state and algorithm of assessment for different types of tourist areas

Authors

  • Oxana A. Klimanova MSU, Faculty of Geography, Russia, 119991, Moscow, GSP-1, 1 Leninskiye Gory
  • Eugeniy Yu. Kolbowsky MSU, Faculty of Geography, Russia, 119991, Moscow, GSP-1, 1 Leninskiye Gory
  • Olga A. Illarionova MSU, Faculty of Geography, Russia, 119991, Moscow, GSP-1, 1 Leninskiye Gory
  • Dmitriy Yu. Zemlyansky MSU, Faculty of Geography, Russia, 119991, Moscow, GSP-1, 1 Leninskiye Gory; Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, Institute of Applied Economic Research, Moscow, Vernadsky prospect, 84, str. 1, 119571

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu07.2021.409

Abstract

The concept of capacity, traditional for classical ecology, in the context of sustainable development has also been used to assess the prospects for the development of sustainable tourism in the territory, it is also included in the Strategy for the Development of Tourism in the Russian Federation for the period up to 2035. The main purpose of the article is to analyze the existing domestic and foreign approaches to the assessment of environmental capacity and to develop on their basis algorithms for assessing capacity for different tourist areas. The analysis of the transformation of the existing methods of assessing environmental capacity, used in Russian and foreign practice since the 1970s, allowed, first, to identify the similarities and differences of scientific and practical approaches to solving this problem, and secondly, to identify the most valuable developments of world practice that are relevant to the Russian reality. Modern ideas about carrying capacity indicate the flexibility and multivariance of this concept, its dependence on both the natural properties of the territory and the types of recreational activities, as well as the degree of satisfaction of the recreational expectations of the tourist. The article proposes a universal algorithm for determining the ecological capacity for different types of tourist areas, based on the assessment of its technogenic and recreational components. The division into two components is fundamental for the methodology, since technogenic capacity is largely regulated by various provisions of existing legislation (codes, regulations, sanitary norms and rules), the indicators of compliance with which are evaluated by normalization and assignment of expert points, and recreational capacity, to a greater extent, depends on the properties of the territory and recreational activities. Among the environmental factors determining tourism capacity factors relating to environmental risks (such as fire hazard, the entropy of the relief, the likelihood of adverse exogenous geodynamic processes), and factors influencing the environment-stabilizing potential of the area (urbanization, plowed, and their) are included in the assessment. The methodology is being tested for two types of tourist territories – the Kenozersky National Park and the Greater Yalta region.

Keywords:

ecological capacity, tourist areas, national park, coastal area, recreation zone, assessment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

References

Воронина, А. Б. (2015). Типология особо охраняемых природных территорий Крыма по видам рекреационной деятельности. Современные научные исследования и инновации, [online] 4 (4), 147-156. Доступно на: https://web.snauka.ru/issues/2015/04/51299 [Дата доступа 25.10.2021].

Государственный комитет по лесному хозяйству СССР (1987). Временная методика определения рекреационных нагрузок на природные комплексы при организации туризма, экскурсий, массового повседневного отдыха и временные нормы этих нагрузок. Москва.

Государственный комитет по лесному хозяйству СССР (1989). Общесоюзные нормативы для таксации лесов. Москва.

Земельный кодекс Российской Федерации от 25.10.2001 № 136-ФЗ (ред. от 06.12.2021) (с изм. и доп., вступ. в силу с 17.12.2021) (2021). [online] Доступно на: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_33773/ [Дата доступа 25.12.2021].

Землянский, Д. Ю., Климанова, О. А., Колбовский, Е. Ю., Илларионова, О. А. (2020). Экологическая емкость туристских территорий: подходы к оценке, индикаторы и алгоритмы расчета. Москва: ВАВТ.

Исаченко, Т. Е., Косарев, А. В. (2019). Рекреационное природопользование. Москва: Юрайт. Казанская, Н. С., Ланина, В. В., Марфенин, Н. Н. (1977). Рекреационные леса. Москва: Лесная промышленность.

Карпенко, С. А. (2013). Рекреационное микрорайонирование Крыма как основа для оценки воздействия активных видов туризма на природные комплексы региона. Ученые записки Таврического национального университета имени В. И. Вернадского. Серия: География, 26 (65), 68-76.

Кременецкая, Е. А., Ярута, О. А. (2016). Особенности рекреационного лесопользования в лесных ландшафтах государственного автономного учреждения Республики Крым «Белогорское лесное хозяйство». Известия сельскохозяйственной науки Тавриды, 6 (169), 25-34.

Меллума, А. Ж., Рунгуле, Р. Х., Эмсис, И. В. (1982). Отдых на природе как природоохранная проблема. Рига: Зинатне.

Правительство Российской Федерации (2019). Стратегия развития туризма в Российской Федерации на период до 2035 года (утверждена Распоряжением Правительства Российской Федерации от 20 сентября 2019 года № 2129-р). Москва.

Пронин, М. И., Русанов, Я. С. (1981). Человек, лес, фауна. Москва: Лесная промышленность.

Репшас, Э. А. (1981). Определение состояния и экологической емкости рекреационных лесов. Каунас: ЛитНИИЛХ.

Таран, И. В., Спиридонов, В. Н. (1977). Устойчивость рекреационных лесов. Новосибирск: Наука.

Тарасенко, В. С., Сапронова, З. Д., Муравский, С. П. (2010). Карта техногенного загрязнения территории Большой Ялты и развития оползневых процессов. Крымский государственный университет.

Теоретические основы рекреационной географии. (1975). Москва: Наука.

Федеральный закон «Об особо охраняемых природных территориях» от 14.03.1995 № 33-ФЗ. (2021). [online] Доступно на: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_6072/ [Дата доступа 25.12.2021].

Чижова, В. П. (1977). Рекреационные нагрузки в зонах отдыха. Москва: Лесная промышленность.

Чижова, В. П. (1997). Школа природы. Москва: Эколого-просветительский центр «Заповедники».

Чижова, В. П., Добров, А. В., Захлебный, А. Н. (1989). Учебные тропы природы. Москва: Агропромиздат.

Яковенко, И. М., Страчкова, Н. В. (2019). Туристско-рекреационный комплекс Республики Крым: пять лет в составе России. Вестник Московского государственного областного университета. Серия: Естественные науки, 2, 101-114. https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-7189-2019-2-101-114

Ahn, B. Y., Lee, B. K. and Shafer, C. S. (2002). Operationalizing sustainability in regional tourism planning: An application of the limits of acceptable change framework. Tourism Management, 23, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(01)00059-0

Buckley, R. (1999). An ecological perspective on carrying capacity. Annals of Tourism Research, 26, 705-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(99)00013-4

Butler, R. W. (1996). The concept of carrying capacity for tourism destinations: Dead or merely buried? Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 2, 283-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/pth.6070020309

Castellani, V. and Sal, S. (2012). Carrying Capacity of Tourism System: Assessment of Environmental and Management Constraints Towards Sustainability. In: Visions for Global Tourism Industry - Creating and Sustaining Competitive Strategies.InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/38750

Coccossis, H. and Mexa, A. (2017). The Challenge of Tourism Carrying Capacity Assessment: Theory and Practice. Routledge.

Coccossis, H., Mexa, A., Collovini, A., Parpairis, A. and Konstandoglou, M. (2001). Defining, measuring and evaluating carrying capacity in European tourism destinations. Environmental Planning Laboratory, 44, 407-416.

Cole, D. N. and Monz, C. A. (2004). Spatial patterns of recreation impact on experimental campsites. Journal of Environmental Management, 70, 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.10.006

Frauman, E. and Banks, S. (2011). Gateway community resident perceptions of tourism development: Incorporating importance-performance analysis into a limits of acceptable change framework. Tourism Management, 32, 128-140.

Goeldner, C. R. and Gartner, W. C. (1997). Tourism Development: Issues for a New Agenda. Journal of Travel Research, 36, 84-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759703600214

Inskeep, E., Reinhold, V. N. (1993). Tourism Planning: An Integrated and Sustainable Development Approach. Journal of Travel Research, 31 (4), 70-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/004728759303100459

Jovicic, D. and Dragin, A. (2008). The assessment of carrying capacity: A crucial tool for managing tourism effects in tourist destinations. Turizam, 4-11. https://doi.org/10.5937/turizam0812004j

Lindberg, K., McCool, S. and Stankey, G. (1997). Rethinking Carrying Capacity. Annals of Tourism Research, 24, 461-465. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(97)80018-7

McCool, S. (2012). Limits of Acceptable Change and tourism. In: The Routledge Handbook of Tourism and the Environment. Taylor and Francis Inc., 285-298. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203121108.ch27

McCool, S. F. and Lime, D. W. (2001). Tourism carrying capacity: Tempting fantasy or useful reality? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 9, 372-388. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580108667409

Navarro Jurado, E., Tejada Tejada, M., Almeida García, F., Cabello González, J., Cortés Macías, R., Delgado Peña, J., Fernández Gutiérrez, F., Gutiérrez Fernández, G., Luque Gallego, M., Málvarez García, G., Marcenaro Gutiérrez, O., Navas Concha, F., Ruiz de la Rúa, F., Ruiz Sinoga, J. and Solís Becerra, F. (2012). Carrying capacity assessment for tourist destinations. Methodology for the creation of synthetic indicators applied in a coastal area. Tourism Management, 33, 1337-1346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.12.017

O’Reilly, A. M. (1986). Tourism carrying capacity. Concept and issues. Tourism Management, 7, 254-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5177(86)90035-X

Papageorgiou, K. and Brotherton, I. (1999). A management planning framework based on ecological, perceptual and economic carrying capacity: The case study of Vikos-Aoos National Park, Greece. Journal of Environmental Management, 56, 271-284. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1999.0285

Saarinen, J. (2006). Traditions of sustainability in tourism studies. Annals of Tourism Research, 33, 1121-1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2006.06.007

Salerno, F., Viviano, G., Manfredi, E. C., Caroli, P., Thakuri, S., Tartari, G. (2013). Multiple Carrying Capacities from a management-oriented perspective to operationalize sustainable tourism in protected areas. Journal of Environmental Management, 128, 116-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.043

Saveriades, A. (2000). Establishing the social tourism carrying capacity for the tourist resorts of the east coast of the Republic of Cyprus. Tourism Management, 21, 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/S02615177(99)00044-8

Simón, F. J. G., Narangajavana, Ye. and Margués, D. P. (2004). Carrying capacity in the tourism industry: A case study of Hengistbury Head. Tourism Management, 25, 275-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S02615177(03)00089-X

Singh, S. (2006). The Challenge of Tourism Carrying Capacity Assessment: Theory and Practice. Tourism Recreation Research, 31, 109-110.

Wagar, J. A. (1964). The Carrying Capacity of Wild Lands for Recreation. Forest Science, 10 (suppl_2), a0001-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/10.s2.a0001

Watson, G. L. and Kopachevsky, J. P. (1996). Tourist Carrying Capacity: A Critical Look at the Discursive Dimension. Progress in Tourism and Hospitality Research, 2, 169-179. https://doi.org/10.1002/pth.6070020205

WTO. (1998). Guide for Local Authorities on Developing Sustainable Tourism. UNWTO Publications. Zelenka, J. and Kacetl, J. (2014) The concept of carrying capacity in tourism. Amfiteatru Economic, 16, 641-654.

Published

2021-11-30

How to Cite

Klimanova, O. A. (2021) “The concept of ecological carrying capacity: current state and algorithm of assessment for different types of tourist areas”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Earth Sciences, 66(4). doi: 10.21638/spbu07.2021.409.

Issue

Section

Articles