Geopolitical and geoeconomical position of Siberia: Modelling and estimation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu07.2017.306Abstract
This article analyses geopolitical space and geopolitical position based on geopolitical notions and categories, such as geopolitical subject. It rethinks and reevaluates the geographical point of view. It derives attributes of synonymy in notions of geopolitical position and geoeconomical position on some conditions. It represents a model of the geopolitical position of subject examined as a ratio of geopolitical strength of the subject to geopolitical strength of outward subjects as considering the influence of every subject and level of political relation on the scale of “friend-foe”. It takes an estimation of the geopolitical and geoeconomical position of Siberia based on the components of the model and finds features of similarity and difference between the geopolitical position of Siberia and the ideal geopolitical position, and where it can be characterized as profitable. It gets a prognosis of its transformation over the near term with considering conception of diversification of oil flows, realizing at the present time. It draws a conclusion to get generally better position of Siberia due to realizing this policy. Refs 21. Figs 3.
Keywords:
geopolitical position, geoeconomics, political geography, theoretical geography, quantitative methods in geography, limology, diversification of oil flows
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Литература
Бакланов, П. Я., Романов, М. Т., 2009. Экономико-географическое положение и геополитическое положение Тихоокеанской России. Дальнаука, Владивосток, 168.
Безруков, Л. А., 2008. Континентально-океаническая дихотомия в международном и региональном развитии. Гео, Новосибирск, 369.
Волынчук, А. Б., 2009. Россия в Приамурье: геополитические интересы или экономическая необходимость. Изд-во ВГУЭС, Владивосток, 168.
Волынчук, А. Б., 2012. Геополитическая экспертиза трансграничного региона Северо-Восточная Азия. Севастьянов, С. В. (под ред.). Дальнаука, Владивосток, 296.
Герасименко, Т. И., 2005. Проблемы этнокультурного развития трансграничных регионов. Санкт-Петербург, 235.
Гладкий, Ю. Н., 2006. Россия в лабиринтах географической судьбы. Юридический центр пресс, Санкт-Петербург, 846.
Елацков, А. Б., 2017. Общая геополитика: вопросы теории и методологии в географической интерпретации. ИНФРА-М, Москва, 251.
Ишмуратов, Б. М., 1998. Экономико-географические и геополитические факторы развития межэтнических отношений на современном этапе (в том числе и в Сибири), в: География и природные ресурсы 1, 5.
Ишмуратов, Б. М., 2003. Сибирь в российской и мировой перспективе (очерки социально-экономической и политической географии). Оттиск, Иркутск, 172.
Колосов, В. А., Туровский, Р. Ф., 2000. Геополитическое положение России на пороге XXI века: реалии и перспективы, в: Полис 3, 40–60.
Лачининский, С. С., Семёнова, И. В., 2015. Санкт-Петербургский приморский регион: геоэкономическая трансформация территории. Лема, Санкт-Петербург, 191.
Михайлов, Ю. П., 2002. Геополитика в географическом освещении и ее приложение к решению социально-экономических проблем Азиатской России, в: География и природные ресурсы 3, 5–10.
Намчак, С. А., 2012. Регионы Российской Федерации как субъект международных отношений, в: Новые исследования Тувы 1, 71–81.
Никольский, А. Ф., 2012. Теория устойчивого развития и вопросы глобальной и национальной безопасности (начала теории современного социализма). Сибирская книга, Иркутск, 358.
Потоцкая, Т. И., 1997. Геополитическое положение Западного района России (Брянская и Смоленская области): автореф. дис. … канд. геогр. наук. МПГУ. Москва, 16.
Фартышев, А. Н., 2016a. Метод расчета степени прозрачности политических границ как геополитической категории, в: Географический вестник 2 (37), 29–39.
Фартышев, А. Н., 2016b. Естественность границ как геополитическая категория, в: Изв. Иркутск. гос. ун-та. Серия: Политология. Религиоведение 17, 33–43.
Фартышев, А. Н., 2016c. Удаленность демографических и экономических центров от соседей как критерий их геополитического положения (на примере России и Сибири), в: Науковедение 8, 5. URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/80EVN516.pdf (дата обращения: 09.03.2017).
Nye, J., 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs Group, New York, 208.
Tobler, W., 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region, in: Economic Geography 46, 2, 234–240.
Wallerstein, I., 2004. World-System Analysis: An Introduction Duke University Press Books, 128.
Wolfers, A., 1962. Discord and Collaboration. Essay of International Politics. Foreword by Reinhold Niebuhr. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 283.
References
Baklanov, P. Ia., Romanov, M. T., 2009. Ekonomiko-geograficheskoe polozhenie i geopoliticheskoe polozhenie Tikhookeanskoi Rossii [Economic-geographical position geopolitical position of Pacific Russia]. Dal’nauka, Vladivostok, 168. (in Russian)
Bezrukov, L. A., 2008. Kontinental’no-okeanicheskaia dikhotomiia v mezhdunarodnom i regional’nom razvitii [The continental-oceanic dichotomy in international and regional development]. Geo, Novosibirsk, 369. (in Russian)
Elatskov, A. B., 2017. Obshchaia geopolitika: voprosy teorii i metodologii v geograficheskoi interpretatsii [General Geopolitics: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Geographical Interpretation]. INFRA-M, Moscow, 251. (in Russian)
Fartyshev, A. N., 2016a. Metod rascheta stepeni prozrachnosti politicheskikh granits kak geopoliticheskoi kategorii [Method of calculating of political borders transparency as a geopolitical category], in: Geograficheskii vestnik [Geographical Herald] 2 (37). 29–39. (in Russian)
Fartyshev, A. N., 2016b. Estestvennost’ granits kak geopoliticheskaia kategoriia [Degree of Naturality of Political Borders as a Geopolitical Category]. Izv. Irkutsk. gos. un-ta. Seriia: Politologiia. Religiovedenie 1 (17), 33–42. (in Russian)
Fartyshev, A. N., 2016c. Udalennost’ demograficheskikh i ekonomicheskikh tsentrov ot sosedei kak kriterii ikh geopoliticheskogo polozheniia (na primere Rossii i Sibiri) [Remoteness of demographical and economical centers to neighbours as criteria of its geopolitical position in example of Russia and Siberia], in: Naukovedenie [Science Research] 8, 5. Available at: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/80EVN516.pdf (accessed 09.03.2017). (in Russian)
Gerasimenko, T. I., 2005. Problemy etnokul’turnogo razvitiia transgranichnykh regionov [Problems of ethniccultural development of trans-border regions]. St. Petersburg, 235. (in Russian)
Gladkii, Iu. N., 2006. Rossiia v labirintakh geograficheskoi sud’by [Russian in the labyrinths of geographical destiny]. Iuridicheskii tsentr press, St. Petersburg, 846. (in Russian)
Ishmuratov, B. M., 1998. Ekonomiko-geograficheskie i geopoliticheskie faktory razvitiia mezhetnicheskikh otnoshenii na sovremennom etape (v tom chisle i v Sibiri) [Economic-geographical and geopolitical factors of development of interetnic relations at the present stage (including in Siberia)], in: Geografiia i prirodnye resursy [Geography and Natural Resourses] 1, 5. (in Russian)
Ishmuratov, B. M., 2003. Sibir’ v rossiiskoi i mirovoi perspektive (ocherki sotsial’no-ekonomicheskoi i politicheskoi geografii) [Siberia in Russian and global perspective (essays of social-economic and political geography)]. Ottisk, Irkutsk, 172. (in Russian)
Kolosov, V. A., Turovskii, R. F., 2000. Geopoliticheskoe polozhenie Rossii na poroge XXI veka: realii i perspektivy [Geopolitical position of Russia on the threshold of XXI century: realities and perspectives]. Polis 3, 40–60. (in Russian)
Lachininskii, S. S., Semenova, I. V., 2015. Sankt-Peterburgskii primorskii region: geoekonomicheskaia transformatsiia territorii [The St. Petersburg seaside region: geoeconomic transformation of the territories]. Lema, St. Petersburg, 191. (in Russian)
Mikhailov, Iu. P., 2002. Geopolitika v geograficheskom osveshchenii i ee prilozhenie k resheniiu sotsial’noekonomicheskikh problem Aziatskoi Rossii [Geopolitics in geographical interpretation and its application for solving social-economic problems of Asian Russia], in: Geografiia i prirodnye resursy [Geography and Natural Resourses] 3, 5–10. (in Russian)
Namchak, S. A., 2012. Regiony Rossiiskoi Federatsii kak sub”ekt mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii [Regions of Russian Federation as a subjects of international relations], in: Novye issledovaniia Tuvy [New Researches of Tuva] 1, 71–81. (in Russian)
Nikol’skii, A. F., 2012. Teoriia ustoichivogo razvitiia i voprosy global’noi i natsional’noi bezopasnosti (nachala teorii sovremennogo sotsializma) [Theory of sustainable development and ssues of global and national security (basis of theory of modern socialism)]. Sibirskaia kniga, Irkutsk, 358. (in Russian)
Nye, J., 2004. Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics. Public Affairs Group, New York, 208.
Pototskaia, T. I., 1997. Geopoliticheskoe polozhenie Zapadnogo raiona Rossii (Brianskaia i Smolenskaia oblasti): avtoref. dis. … kand. geogr. nauk [Geopolitical position of West region Of Russia (Bryansk and Smolensk districts): Thesis of PhD Diss.]. MSPU, Moscow, 16. (in Russian)
Tobler, W., 1970. A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Economic Geography 46 2, 234–240.
Volynchuk, A. B., 2009. Rossiia v Priamur’e: geopoliticheskie interesy ili ekonomicheskaia neobkhodimost’ [Russia in Priamurye: geopolitical interests or economical needs]. VGUES Publ., Vladivostok, 168. (in Russian)
Volynchuk, A. B., 2012. Geopoliticheskaia ekspertiza transgranichnogo regiona Severo-Vostochnaia Aziia [Geopolitical expertise of transborder region]. Dal’nauka, Vladivostok, 296. (in Russian)
Wallerstein, I., 2004. World-System Analysis: An Introduction. Duke University Press Books, 128.
Wolfers, A., 1962. Discord and Collaboration. Essay of International Politics. Foreword by Reinhold Niebuhr. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 283.
Downloads
Published
2017-12-28
How to Cite
Фартышев, А. Н. (2017) “Geopolitical and geoeconomical position of Siberia: Modelling and estimation”, Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Earth Sciences, 62(3), pp. 300–310. doi: 10.21638/11701/spbu07.2017.306.
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Articles of "Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Earth Sciences" are open access distributed under the terms of the License Agreement with Saint Petersburg State University, which permits to the authors unrestricted distribution and self-archiving free of charge.
